Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 19, 2015 at 1:19 comment added Alexandre Eremenko This conjecture is discussed in B. Elsner's thesis, archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/AIF/AIF_1999__49_1/…. As far as I know it is still open. It is remarkable how many good mathematicians proposed wrongs proofs of this.
Jul 26, 2012 at 22:14 history edited Willie Wong
edited tags
Jun 16, 2012 at 1:43 comment added HeWhoHungers Any particular reason this doesn't have the open problem tag?
May 1, 2011 at 13:31 comment added Gunnar Þór Magnússon @Georges: Thank you for clearing that up.
Apr 23, 2011 at 15:58 comment added Georges Elencwajg @ Gunnar: yes the the question is the same as the conjecture in the Wikipedia article you mention. There is a good reason for that: the conjecture is due to MathOMan ! This is not apparent from the article because in the bibliography MathOMan appears under his real name . (I'm divulging no secret since MathOMan says so himself in his answer below)
Apr 19, 2011 at 23:31 comment added Gunnar Þór Magnússon FYI: The question is copy-pasted from the Wikipedia article on the Picard theorem, see the 4th note at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard_theorem
Apr 19, 2011 at 19:08 answer added MathOMan timeline score: 1
Apr 18, 2011 at 20:33 answer added MathOMan timeline score: 2
Apr 16, 2011 at 13:14 answer added Bill Thurston timeline score: 12
Apr 16, 2011 at 8:03 history edited MathOMan CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Apr 16, 2011 at 8:02 comment added MathOMan No, Tom Goodwillie, I don't see any necessity to suppose the U_j connected. But if you prefer you can suppose them connected.
Apr 16, 2011 at 4:02 comment added Tom Goodwillie Maybe you want to assume that the $U_j$ are connected; otherwise it's not true even in the residue zero case.
Apr 15, 2011 at 23:36 history asked MathOMan CC BY-SA 3.0