Timeline for What is the homotopy theory of categories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2011 at 1:07 | comment | added | Akhil Mathew | Dear David, thanks! I've started reading Cisinski, though it's probably going to take some time to get far in it. | |
| Apr 15, 2011 at 8:19 | comment | added | Jonathan Chiche | I think the emphasis on presheaf models is due to the difficulty of the general case! This is explained in the introduction of Maltsiniotis's book. | |
| Apr 15, 2011 at 6:50 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
| Apr 15, 2011 at 6:48 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Ah, that would explain the emphasis on presheaf models, where the cofibrations are taken to be monomorphisms. | |
| Apr 15, 2011 at 6:44 | comment | added | Tim Porter | Point of Info: Grothendieck actually did not like Thomason's structure as the cofibrations worried him. | |
| Apr 15, 2011 at 6:32 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Thanks, Theo. I knew they were available electronically somewhere - just not from Cisinski's home page! | |
| Apr 15, 2011 at 5:47 | comment | added | Theo Buehler | All the relevant papers can be found on Maltsiniotis' homepage: math.jussieu.fr/~maltsin/ps.html | |
| Apr 15, 2011 at 5:15 | history | answered | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |