Timeline for Is it OK for a referee to acknowledge identity with a previous referee?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10 at 4:24 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Apr 14, 2011 at 23:44 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | Indeed. This is a case where I'm for naming and shaming the journal. Writing referee reports is hard enough; not passing them on to the author is unconscionable. | |
| Apr 14, 2011 at 22:46 | comment | added | Ori Gurel-Gurevich | @Matthew: what kind of journal doesn't send the authors a report? | |
| Apr 14, 2011 at 8:03 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | +1 as I wish all referees behaved as you did! Having been on the receiving end of this, it's always worth bearing in mind that the journal doesn't always send your report on to the author (with a co-author, I got an annoyed report saying "I've rejected this 2 times already, why do you keep resubmitting?", but this was actually the first proper report we'd had back, and it's hard for an author to make a judgement, given no information). | |
| Apr 14, 2011 at 3:13 | history | answered | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |