Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

fixed broken link to ams.org; added zbMATH review links in tooltips
Source Link
edit approved Mar 30 at 10:05
The Amplitwist
edit approved Mar 30 at 10:05
The Amplitwist
  • 1.4k
  • 3
  • 11
  • 22

Beilinson's original paper on Height pairingsBeilinson's original paper on Height pairings does indicate how his height pairing generalises that of Neron-TateNéron–Tate: see page 10 (also, MullerMüller-Stach and Kunneman's works expand on Remark 4.0.8 on page 14). Also, Scholl's paperScholl's paper provides a very nice interpretation (via Ext in mixed motives).

Beilinson's original paper on Height pairings does indicate how his height pairing generalises that of Neron-Tate: see page 10 (also, Muller-Stach and Kunneman's works expand on Remark 4.0.8 on page 14). Also, Scholl's paper provides a very nice interpretation (via Ext in mixed motives).

Beilinson's original paper on Height pairings does indicate how his height pairing generalises that of Néron–Tate: see page 10 (also, Müller-Stach and Kunneman's works expand on Remark 4.0.8 on page 14). Also, Scholl's paper provides a very nice interpretation (via Ext in mixed motives).

Source Link
SGP
SGP
  • 3.9k
  • 20
  • 32

Beilinson's original paper on Height pairings does indicate how his height pairing generalises that of Neron-Tate: see page 10 (also, Muller-Stach and Kunneman's works expand on Remark 4.0.8 on page 14). Also, Scholl's paper provides a very nice interpretation (via Ext in mixed motives).