Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Mod Removes Wiki by Todd Trimble
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

As with this older related questionthis older related question, question anonymous for obvious reasons.

If I have been asked to review the same paper twice, is it OK to acknowledge in my review that I am the same person as one of the referees from last time? I'm sure cryptographers would frown on that sort of thing, but it's not clear that there is actually a practical problem with this.

Thanks!

As with this older related question, question anonymous for obvious reasons.

If I have been asked to review the same paper twice, is it OK to acknowledge in my review that I am the same person as one of the referees from last time? I'm sure cryptographers would frown on that sort of thing, but it's not clear that there is actually a practical problem with this.

Thanks!

As with this older related question, question anonymous for obvious reasons.

If I have been asked to review the same paper twice, is it OK to acknowledge in my review that I am the same person as one of the referees from last time? I'm sure cryptographers would frown on that sort of thing, but it's not clear that there is actually a practical problem with this.

Thanks!

Post Made Community Wiki by Anonymous but equalitytestable
Source Link
Anonymous but equalitytestable
Anonymous but equalitytestable
  • 101
  • 4

Is it OK for a referee to acknowledge identity with a previous referee?

As with this older related question, question anonymous for obvious reasons.

If I have been asked to review the same paper twice, is it OK to acknowledge in my review that I am the same person as one of the referees from last time? I'm sure cryptographers would frown on that sort of thing, but it's not clear that there is actually a practical problem with this.

Thanks!