Timeline for Explanation for gamma function in formula for $n$-ball volume
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 28, 2022 at 9:05 | comment | added | D.R. | It's certainly a nice property, but not entirely relevant/critical here, right? In fact I don't really know where exactly such a property is "powerful"/useful. | |
Feb 28, 2022 at 8:30 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | @D.R. The Gaussian lets you reduce to a product of 1-dimensional integrals. This is incredibly powerful. | |
Feb 24, 2022 at 23:15 | comment | added | D.R. | Isn't it true that given any $G(r)$ on $[0,\infty)$ such that $g(x_1,\ldots, x_n) := G(\sqrt{x_1^2+\ldots + x_n^2})$ is a rotationally symmetric probability distribution on $\mathbb R^n$, then the same computation holds, i.e. $1 = \int_{\mathbb R^n} g d x = \int_0^\infty \text{vol}(S^{n-1}(r)) G(r) d r$? In that case, why is the Gaussian the most natural choice? Perhaps it is the fact that the Gaussian is the only distribution that is rotational symmetric and has independent coordinates, so it's the only that gives a sort of "uniform" formula for all $n$? | |
S Oct 30, 2015 at 0:23 | history | suggested | hbp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix some LaTeX symbols.
|
Oct 30, 2015 at 0:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 30, 2015 at 0:23 | |||||
Nov 28, 2009 at 3:52 | history | edited | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
TeXified
|
Nov 19, 2009 at 20:27 | history | edited | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 70 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2009 at 20:21 | history | answered | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |