Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 28, 2022 at 9:05 comment added D.R. It's certainly a nice property, but not entirely relevant/critical here, right? In fact I don't really know where exactly such a property is "powerful"/useful.
Feb 28, 2022 at 8:30 comment added S. Carnahan @D.R. The Gaussian lets you reduce to a product of 1-dimensional integrals. This is incredibly powerful.
Feb 24, 2022 at 23:15 comment added D.R. Isn't it true that given any $G(r)$ on $[0,\infty)$ such that $g(x_1,\ldots, x_n) := G(\sqrt{x_1^2+\ldots + x_n^2})$ is a rotationally symmetric probability distribution on $\mathbb R^n$, then the same computation holds, i.e. $1 = \int_{\mathbb R^n} g d x = \int_0^\infty \text{vol}(S^{n-1}(r)) G(r) d r$? In that case, why is the Gaussian the most natural choice? Perhaps it is the fact that the Gaussian is the only distribution that is rotational symmetric and has independent coordinates, so it's the only that gives a sort of "uniform" formula for all $n$?
S Oct 30, 2015 at 0:23 history suggested hbp CC BY-SA 3.0
fix some LaTeX symbols.
Oct 30, 2015 at 0:05 review Suggested edits
S Oct 30, 2015 at 0:23
Nov 28, 2009 at 3:52 history edited S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 2.5
TeXified
Nov 19, 2009 at 20:27 history edited S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 2.5
added 70 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
Nov 19, 2009 at 20:21 history answered S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 2.5