Timeline for How to memorise (understand) Nakayama's lemma and its corollaries?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2016 at 23:36 | comment | added | roy smith | this proof is given in one sentance on page 1 of Serre's Local Algebra. | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 10:50 | comment | added | ACL | Do you have a published reference for this proof? | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 10:50 | comment | added | ACL | By the way, if you're ready to zornicate/zornify, rather observe that the set of proper submodules of a non-zero finitely generated module is inductive, hence has a maximal element. | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 10:49 | comment | added | ACL | +1 for the Zornication! | |
| Apr 27, 2011 at 21:29 | comment | added | user1421 | That's the way I like to think of it too: a finitely generated module over any ring (with identity) has a simple quotient. | |
| Apr 13, 2011 at 8:25 | history | edited | user91132 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2011 at 8:14 | history | answered | user91132 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |