Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 2, 2011 at 1:11 comment added Eric Naslund It is worth looking at the multiple testing example under the Prosecutor's Fallacy: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… This explains another way that data in the court room can be misinterpreted.
Jun 1, 2011 at 23:49 comment added Kevin H. Lin Eric, maybe you mean 1-(1-1/10000)^20000 ?
May 31, 2011 at 19:42 comment added Beren Sanders From the Supreme Court's decision: "Mathematics, a veritable sorcerer in our computerized society, while assisting the trier of fact in the search for truth, must not cast a spell over him."
Apr 13, 2011 at 23:03 comment added Vectornaut Very interesting! I'd heard of the case before, but I never knew the verdict was overturned. Arguably, the best-known (and most awful) example of this kind of thing is the Sally Clark case: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Clark. The Royal Statistical Society wrote a very good public statement about it. The statement is posted on the RSS web site, but unfortunately the link seems to be broken.
Apr 13, 2011 at 18:57 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez And one of the judges dissented?!
Apr 13, 2011 at 18:31 history edited Kevin O'Bryant CC BY-SA 3.0
added color
Apr 13, 2011 at 1:13 history answered Kevin O'Bryant CC BY-SA 3.0