Skip to main content
added link to paper, improved formatting
Source Link
R.P.
  • 4.7k
  • 19
  • 43
  • 67

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2 \times \mathbb R$$S^2 \times \mathbb{R}$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2 \times S^1$ and $P^3 \# P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2 \times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

Edit. As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. Of course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2 \times \mathbb R$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2 \times S^1$ and $P^3 \# P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2 \times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

Edit. As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. Of course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2 \times \mathbb{R}$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2 \times S^1$ and $P^3 \# P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2 \times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

Edit. As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. Of course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds""The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2\times R$$S^2 \times \mathbb R$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2\times S^1$$P^2 \times S^1$ and $P^3\sharp P^3$$P^3 \# P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2\times S^1$$S^2 \times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

(How do I get a connect sum symbol in maths mode!?)

EDIT: Used \sharp as Richard suggested.

FURTHER EDIT: AsEdit. As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. OfOf course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2\times R$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2\times S^1$ and $P^3\sharp P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2\times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

(How do I get a connect sum symbol in maths mode!?)

EDIT: Used \sharp as Richard suggested.

FURTHER EDIT: As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. Of course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2 \times \mathbb R$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2 \times S^1$ and $P^3 \# P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2 \times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

Edit. As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. Of course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

added 166 characters in body
Source Link
HJRW
  • 25k
  • 3
  • 68
  • 144

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2\times R$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2\times S^1$ and $P^3\sharp P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2\times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

(How do I get a connect sum symbol in maths mode!?)

EDIT: Used \sharp as Richard suggested.

FURTHER EDIT: As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. Of course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2\times R$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2\times S^1$ and $P^3\sharp P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2\times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

(How do I get a connect sum symbol in maths mode!?)

EDIT: Used \sharp as Richard suggested.

According to Scott's paper "The geometries of 3-manifolds", the only closed manifolds that admit an $S^2\times R$ geometry are the two $S^2$ bundles over $S^1$, $P^2\times S^1$ and $P^3\sharp P^3$. It seems like the last one is the only candidate (unless I'm missing a way in which $S^2\times S^1$ can be viewed as such a bundle).

(How do I get a connect sum symbol in maths mode!?)

EDIT: Used \sharp as Richard suggested.

FURTHER EDIT: As pointed out below, I spoke too soon. Of course such bundles could have spherical geometry too. Scott's paper is a nice reference for that too!

Introduced sharp
Source Link
HJRW
  • 25k
  • 3
  • 68
  • 144
Loading
Source Link
HJRW
  • 25k
  • 3
  • 68
  • 144
Loading