Timeline for Intersection probability for 'N' fixed-length rods in one- or two-dimensions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2011 at 17:05 | comment | added | Rob Grey | Thanks jc... I wouldn't have thought to use the word 'stick'. | |
| Apr 12, 2011 at 17:04 | vote | accept | Rob Grey | ||
| Apr 12, 2011 at 16:49 | comment | added | j.c. | This isn't quite what you're asking about, but percolation of randomly placed rods often goes by the name "stick percolation" in the literature. See for instance this paper of Rahul Roy for some rigorous work math.bme.hu/~balint/oktatas/perkolacio/percolation_papers/… , and this paper of Jiantong Li and Shi-Li Zhang for some numerical work link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.040104 | |
| Apr 12, 2011 at 16:20 | answer | added | Anthony Quas | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 12, 2011 at 14:57 | comment | added | Rob Grey | Thanks, I hopefully just clarified what I meant. I basically want the easiest possible treatment for the boundary of the surface. | |
| Apr 12, 2011 at 14:55 | history | edited | Rob Grey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 447 characters in body
|
| Apr 12, 2011 at 14:09 | comment | added | user9072 | How are they placed? (Of course, somehow 'randomly', but I could imagine that at least in the two dimensional case, there are different natural ways how one could think of placing them 'randomly', affecting the result. So it might be good to specifiy this or at least to state that this is not so, or you do not care about this aspect.) | |
| Apr 12, 2011 at 14:02 | history | asked | Rob Grey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |