Timeline for Normal measures on $P_{\kappa }(\lambda )$ extend the club filter
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 10, 2011 at 15:40 | comment | added | Amit Kumar Gupta | Thanks for the response! I think the argument in the second last paragraph can be simplified a little: If $g:P_{\kappa}(\lambda)\to C$ is a surjection in V, then $j(g)\upharpoonright j''P_{\kappa}(\lambda)$ belongs to $M$ by your observation that $j''P_{\kappa}(\lambda)$ does, and it surjects onto D. Also, by your observation that $P_{\kappa}^M(\lambda) = P_{\kappa}^V(\lambda)$, we can define a surjection $e : P_{\kappa}(\lambda) \to j''P_{\kappa}(\lambda)$ by $e(x) = h''x$. Thus in M, $|D| \leq |P_{\kappa}(\lambda)| = \lambda^{<\kappa} < j(\kappa)$ since $j(\kappa)$ is inaccessible in $M$. | |
Apr 9, 2011 at 15:48 | vote | accept | Amit Kumar Gupta | ||
Apr 9, 2011 at 6:31 | comment | added | Jason | Small omission: should say range of $j(g)$ restricted to $j''P_{\kappa}\lambda$, which is exactly $j''\lambda^{{<}\kappa}$. | |
Apr 9, 2011 at 4:45 | history | undeleted | Jason | ||
Apr 9, 2011 at 4:44 | history | edited | Jason | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Elaborated on proof
|
Apr 9, 2011 at 2:50 | history | deleted | Jason | ||
Apr 9, 2011 at 0:40 | history | edited | Jason | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
$M$ will not necessarily exhibit this closure if $j: V \rightarrow M$ wasn't an ultrapower embedding
|
Apr 8, 2011 at 22:47 | history | answered | Jason | CC BY-SA 3.0 |