Timeline for Kahler differentials and Ordinary Differentials
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 20, 2009 at 19:42 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear Alberto, thank you for your update but of course I strongly discourage anybody to vote you down! I am incredibly impressed by the intellectual honesty and fair-play that I am witnessing from David and you: this is MUCH more admirable than any result on Kähler differentials. | |
Nov 20, 2009 at 13:16 | history | edited | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 294 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2009 at 16:51 | comment | added | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | You're right: that choice of words was unfortunate. I have clarified it now. | |
Nov 19, 2009 at 16:49 | history | edited | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Clarified how $\Omega^1_{X,x}$ corepresents derivations.; added 2 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2009 at 16:15 | comment | added | Konrad Voelkel | I think "represents" is not to be taken in it's literal sense in the sentence "the stalk at x of the sheaf of Kähler differentials represents derivations". But it can easily be rewritten to eventually get a representation of $Der(\mathcal{O}_{X,x}, k)$. | |
Nov 19, 2009 at 13:41 | history | edited | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 166 characters in body; deleted 35 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2009 at 13:30 | history | undeleted | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | ||
Nov 19, 2009 at 13:30 | history | edited | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 525 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2009 at 13:19 | history | deleted | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | ||
Nov 19, 2009 at 13:18 | history | answered | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | CC BY-SA 2.5 |