Timeline for Generalization of Moise's theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2011 at 8:29 | comment | added | Sam Nead | I looked and I believe that this is correct. The fact that there are two surfaces doesn't matter. You can take any finite collection of immersions of compact surfaces and take the union of the maps. There will be a triangulation of $M$ where the resulting image is a subcomplex. | |
| Apr 6, 2011 at 8:14 | vote | accept | Ethan Fetaya | ||
| Apr 6, 2011 at 8:08 | answer | added | Greg Kuperberg | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 6, 2011 at 8:04 | comment | added | Sam Nead | I think this is in Chapter 1 of Hempel's book? | |
| Apr 6, 2011 at 7:53 | history | asked | Ethan Fetaya | CC BY-SA 2.5 |