Timeline for Formal geometry
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Nov 19, 2009 at 14:17 | comment | added | David Jordan | Ben, yes I did notice with some excitement that it came up tangentially in Jacob's lecture (although, again, the focus is different...). I say excitement because I am using it in some more obscure project unconnected to Langlands (globalization of lower central series of noncommutative algebras). However, as good as Jacob's lecture was, it's not the sort of reference I was seeking. It seems that the FGK paper referenced in BD1 above will have to do. I had hoped to find a textbook reference so I wouldn't have to write it all up myself. I'll look at BF reference today and see... | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:48 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | It was also explained to the three of us by Jacob Lurie on Tuesday... | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:38 | comment | added | David Jordan | Okay well as I thought they are interested mainly in the case of a curve, but I see they provide references to several papers I was unaware of, and they also use different terminology than I was searching for. This is tremendously helpful, thanks! | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:36 | vote | accept | David Jordan | ||
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:30 | comment | added | David Jordan | Now I'll probably find out you have those checked out as well =] | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:30 | comment | added | David Jordan | Hmm.. I read (term used loosely) these way back during the lead-up to Talbot seminar (not Ben-Zvi's Talbot, but Gaitsgory's). While I see some relations between these and the situation above, it appears I overlooked/forgot how closely it is related to the above situation; as I recall, those texts discuss curves and G-bundles, where G is an auxiliary group (i.e. not necessarily the group of automorphisms of the formal neighborhood). I'm happy to hear this is related to those texts, because the motivation has nothing to do with geometric Langland's stuff... | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 3:49 | history | answered | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |