Timeline for Clifford PBW theorem for quadratic form
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 27 at 9:39 | history | suggested | The Amplitwist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed broken link to Wikipedia
|
| Mar 27 at 7:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 27 at 9:39 | |||||
| Nov 27, 2021 at 3:18 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Displayed displayed equation; `\DeclareMathOperator`
|
| Nov 27, 2021 at 1:52 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Mar 11, 2012 at 19:41 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
URL updated
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 3:45 | vote | accept | darij grinberg | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 3:44 | answer | added | darij grinberg | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 23:05 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
split into 2 questions
|
| Feb 3, 2012 at 0:01 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
my old definition of a quadratic form was wrong even for fields (although it was true if the field is separable over its prime field), hence clearly inappropriate
|
| Apr 10, 2011 at 13:05 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
stupid typo is stupid
|
| Apr 4, 2011 at 20:49 | answer | added | MTS | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 19:39 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Probably. I just haven't checked. I don't know much about the diamond lemma in infinite cases. | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 19:38 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | If it is true in the finite-free case it should work in the free case, no? | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 19:36 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 368 characters in body
|
| Apr 4, 2011 at 19:30 | history | asked | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |