Timeline for resolution of singularities and "permissible" blow-ups.
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2011 at 0:17 | history | edited | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Removed EDIT, I don't think it was right.; added 51 characters in body
|
| Apr 5, 2011 at 15:08 | history | edited | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Made a comment.
|
| Apr 5, 2011 at 15:07 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | After additional thought, I don't think this can work in full generality, but it might give you some tools in the specific case you are looking at. | |
| Apr 5, 2011 at 7:05 | comment | added | Franz | Thanks very much! I will look at the Kollar-Kovacs' paper very carrefully so! | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 22:37 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | Franz, I should have said relative minimal dlt model. There's some discussion of this in the KK paper I link above. In particular, see theorem 3.1 in that paper (on the existence of such things). Anyway, I think I cleaned up my answer a bit. The first thing I was worried about was not really a worry. | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 22:34 | history | edited | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Fixed several things
|
| Apr 4, 2011 at 17:38 | vote | accept | Franz | ||
| Apr 4, 2011 at 17:31 | comment | added | Franz | Hi Karl! Thanks for your answer. I will think about it but you could you explain just a bit more the second part of your answer (I am not very used with relative divisorial log terminal model...)? Thanks again for your time. | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 17:10 | history | answered | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |