Timeline for Formal geometry
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2021 at 8:07 | comment | added | YCor | I've formatted, but wasn't sure whether $\ast$ should be replaced with $\times$. | |
| Nov 16, 2021 at 8:07 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Jul 5, 2019 at 6:24 | comment | added | LSpice | Incidentally, I'm not sure when they went up, but ICM proceedings are now available online: mathunion.org/icm/proceedings . | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 13:55 | comment | added | David Jordan | Hi Damien! Okay I'll take a look, thanks. Perhaps I should also post a cw answer which collects all these references together. Thanks, David | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 13:28 | comment | added | DamienC | David, the connection you mention seems to be the so-called Grothendieck connection. If you like algebra more than geometry you might want to take a look at the following reference: arxiv.org/pdf/0708.2725 (Section 5). Van den Bergh paper (arxiv.org/pdf/math/0603200, Section 6) is very enlighting from an algebro-geometric perspective. | |
| Jun 20, 2010 at 23:55 | history | edited | David Jordan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 159 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2010 at 23:06 | answer | added | David Jordan | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 6, 2010 at 23:56 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Why aren't these put up in an archive on the internet? I'm sure whoever organizes ICM could get some money for it. | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 18:09 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | Ye, it was the best approximation to Math Overflow that could be had with the book medium. | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 16:36 | answer | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 14:53 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 14:16 | comment | added | David Jordan | Yes, I never realized before how interesting it is to read ICM proceedings; you have top mathematicians writing somewhat informally about developments in their field - it's great! | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:55 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | No, I was looking at Deligne and Grothendieck (both very good) | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:36 | vote | accept | David Jordan | ||
| Nov 19, 2009 at 4:11 | comment | added | David Jordan | I don't know why I post on here. I should just come by your office every so often. You weren't after the same article were you?? | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 3:57 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Are you the person who recently recalled the library copy of the 1970 ICM proceedings? I merely ask out of curiosity :) | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 3:49 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 3:17 | comment | added | David Jordan | hmm. The website didn't appear to believe I was a human being when I submitted this... | |
| Nov 19, 2009 at 3:16 | history | asked | David Jordan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |