Timeline for When is the torsion subgroup of an abelian group a direct summand?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 24, 2022 at 11:51 | comment | added | The Amplitwist |
The link to eom.springer.de is broken, but the article can now be found at encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/Cotorsion_group.
|
|
Jun 22, 2022 at 8:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
|
|
Dec 24, 2016 at 15:09 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified the characterization
|
Dec 12, 2016 at 16:56 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Apr 4, 2011 at 12:02 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 107 characters in body
|
Apr 4, 2011 at 11:52 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body
|
Apr 4, 2011 at 11:52 | vote | accept | Pete L. Clark | ||
Apr 4, 2011 at 11:51 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Wait, never mind -- I guess the answer is obviously no: the group $\bigoplus_{p \in \mathcal{P}} \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ (where $\mathcal{P}$ is the set of all prime numbers) is a counterexample. | |
Apr 4, 2011 at 11:46 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Gjergji: thanks, this is very helpful. Do you happen to know whether every "cofinite type" torsion group is a cotorsion group? (I guess I will learn the answer to this by reading the relevant parts of Fuchs' book...) | |
Apr 4, 2011 at 9:31 | history | answered | Gjergji Zaimi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |