Timeline for uniqueness of regular/tubular neighborhood with equivariant boundary
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2011 at 23:43 | vote | accept | Sergey Melikhov | ||
| Apr 12, 2011 at 17:40 | answer | added | Sergey Melikhov | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 9:05 | history | edited | Sergey Melikhov | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 127 characters in body
|
| Apr 4, 2011 at 2:45 | answer | added | Qayum Khan | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 1:57 | comment | added | Sergey Melikhov | Of course, the nontrivial case is when they are not preserved, and this was the point of the example. Sorry if it doesn't read smoothly. | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 1:10 | comment | added | Tom Goodwillie | In the example you mention, $N$ and its complement are interchanged by the involution. This is not clear from your first paragraph; at first I imagined that $P$ and $N$ were subpolyhedra of $M$ preserved by the involution (in which the question could be approached by working in the orbit space). | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 0:16 | history | asked | Sergey Melikhov | CC BY-SA 2.5 |