Timeline for Hopfian property preserved by extensions with finite kernel?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 18, 2021 at 8:06 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replaced the link to the arXiv front end; see https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/5124/is-it-time-to-replace-links-to-the-ucdavis-arxiv-frontend
|
Mar 21, 2020 at 16:51 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
reorganized for the sake of clarity
|
Dec 3, 2016 at 20:24 | comment | added | YCor | @BS. thanks for the correction; this seems to fix the argument. | |
Jul 22, 2012 at 17:41 | comment | added | BS. | On the other hand, a similar idea might work : take $N=F_p[t^2]$ and $M=<N,t^{-1}$. Then $G/N$ is non-Hopfian, but since no non-trivial translation of $\mathbb{Z}$ sends $E={-1,0,2,4,...,2k,...}$ (strictly) inside itself, the conjugation counterexample breaks down and your argument might work. | |
Jul 22, 2012 at 16:58 | comment | added | BS. | Sorry if I missed something, but doesn't conjugation by $diag(t^2,1,1,1)$ define an automorphism of $G$ that sends $M$ strictly inside itself (implying $G/M$ non-Hopfian)? | |
Jul 22, 2012 at 4:12 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added introducing sentence to make the post more understandable.
|
Apr 2, 2011 at 23:11 | comment | added | Igor Belegradek | I just edited tex by inserting dollar signs etc. | |
Apr 2, 2011 at 23:10 | history | edited | Igor Belegradek | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited tex
|
Apr 2, 2011 at 21:36 | history | answered | YCor | CC BY-SA 2.5 |