Timeline for Status of an open problem about semilinear sets
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 29, 2015 at 11:38 | answer | added | Christoph Haase | timeline score: 4 | |
Jan 16, 2014 at 12:06 | vote | accept | Tara Brough | ||
Jan 16, 2014 at 10:39 | answer | added | user45611 | timeline score: 10 | |
Dec 9, 2013 at 16:25 | answer | added | user43911 | timeline score: 3 | |
Apr 18, 2011 at 11:56 | history | edited | Tara Brough |
deleted arithmetic-progression tag
|
|
Apr 3, 2011 at 14:30 | history | edited | Tara Brough |
Added a couple more tags.
|
|
Apr 3, 2011 at 14:26 | comment | added | Tara Brough | Thanks. Certainly I don't really have the r=1 case in mind at all, since then the stratified condition means nothing. I have no idea whether this question would be interesting to number theorists, but I suppose it can't hurt to try putting the tag on. | |
Apr 3, 2011 at 14:16 | history | edited | Tara Brough |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 1, 2011 at 20:35 | comment | added | Thomas Sauvaget | I've added the "arithmetic-progression" tag (even though you probably don't have only the r=1 case in mind). Perhaps even the "nt.number-theory" one might be appropriate (and would add the benefit of a substantial readership). | |
Apr 1, 2011 at 20:28 | history | edited | Thomas Sauvaget |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 1, 2011 at 14:18 | history | edited | Tara Brough | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 125 characters in body
|
Apr 1, 2011 at 13:16 | history | asked | Tara Brough | CC BY-SA 2.5 |