Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jul 13, 2022 at 11:26 history suggested Adi Shavit CC BY-SA 4.0
Fix Green's name to correct Greene.
Jul 13, 2022 at 8:35 review Suggested edits
S Jul 13, 2022 at 11:26
Aug 23, 2020 at 18:39 comment added domotorp Oh, I see, so the answer to my question is n-2! On one hand, this is an upper bound given by any triangulation. On the other, if an n-gon has a concave arc of n-2 consecutive segments, i.e., with n-3 reflex vertices, then obviously n-2 pieces are needed. Thanks!
Aug 23, 2020 at 17:34 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @domotorp: Sorry for the delay. The best possible is $\lceil r/2 \rceil + 1$, where $r$ is the number of reflex vertices, because each reflex vertex must be resolved, and at most two reflex vertices can be resolved by a single partition segment. The min might be as high as $r+1$ depending on alignment of the reflexivities.
Aug 22, 2020 at 21:43 comment added domotorp (But I can wait a day.)
Aug 22, 2020 at 21:43 comment added domotorp I've looked at many of these papers, but all of them seems to be about the computational complexity of the optimum value for a given input. I'm just looking for a simple expression, like n/3 for the art gallery problem.
Aug 22, 2020 at 21:12 comment added Joseph O'Rourke Keil, Mark, and Jack Snoeyink. "On the time bound for convex decomposition of simple polygons." International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications 12, no. 03 (2002): 181-192. Abstract: "We show that a decomposition of a simple polygon having $n$ vertices, $r$of which are reflex, into a minimum number of convex regions without the addition of Steiner vertices can be computed in $O(n + r^2\min{r^2, n})$ time and space."
Aug 22, 2020 at 19:50 comment added domotorp What is the minimum number of pieces needed for partitioning/covering an n-gon to convex pieces?
Jul 29, 2017 at 12:47 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
Broken link fixed.
Mar 10, 2017 at 15:58 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed image, which was temporarily lost due to StackExchange changes.
Mar 31, 2011 at 18:12 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 2.5
Added figure from p.61 of book.; added 25 characters in body
Mar 31, 2011 at 17:38 history answered Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 2.5