Timeline for The generalization of Brouwer's fixed point theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17 at 18:20 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | Similar MSE question | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 23:10 | comment | added | Daniel Litt | Alex: it is generally considered to be bad etiquette to edit your question substantively after answers have been posted (and accepted!). It might be worth reading some of the literature (e.g. Bing's article) and then posting a new question, with whatever information you discover upon doing so. | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 22:37 | history | edited | Alex Gavrilov | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2011 at 12:24 | history | edited | Alex Gavrilov | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2011 at 11:24 | vote | accept | Alex Gavrilov | ||
| Mar 28, 2011 at 4:34 | answer | added | Daniel Litt | timeline score: 25 | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 4:11 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | It is true if $X$ is triangulable by the Lefschetz fixed point theorem. I don't know what happens if $X$ is not triangulable. | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 4:11 | history | edited | Alex Gavrilov | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2011 at 4:05 | history | asked | Alex Gavrilov | CC BY-SA 2.5 |