Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
May 28, 2013 at 1:20 comment added Maarten Derickx A small remark. I just read the paper on Bjorn Poonen his website and in his article and he talks about "Guess" and "Question" and not about conjecture. I have the feeling he does this on purpose and that this is meant to indicate that he is not really convinced yet that the answer to his question will be positive.
Mar 31, 2011 at 13:30 vote accept Barinder Banwait
Mar 28, 2011 at 21:31 comment added Barinder Banwait Thanks for that, it was just what I needed. In the toy example, $J$ is indeed simple, so there (assuming the conjecture) $r' = 2$, and the Chabauty-Coleman method will not work.
Mar 28, 2011 at 16:28 comment added Tzanko Matev There is a conjecture due to Bjorn Poonen (www-math.mit.edu/~poonen/papers/leopoldt.pdf) which implies that if $J$ is simple, then $r'=r$. So, if you believe it you will have to pick $J$ to be a product of two elliptic curves, with ranks 2 and 0 respectively.For any Jacobian of this type $r'$ will be 1.
Mar 26, 2011 at 13:03 comment added Chris Wuthrich If you know how to compute the $p$-adic logarithm on the formal group for your $J$, then you could just check by computing with sufficient precision if the image of the generators of $J(\mathbb{Q})$ are independent in the Lie algebra.
Mar 26, 2011 at 2:54 answer added Felipe Voloch timeline score: 7
Mar 25, 2011 at 23:52 history asked Barinder Banwait CC BY-SA 2.5