Skip to main content
Image link broken; now fixed.
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 150.9k
  • 36
  • 358
  • 958

Perhaps I am misinterpreting the question, but if you mean: What is the maximum, over all $z_1$ and $z_2$, of the minimum number of segments in a polygonal line connecting $z_1$ to $z_2$, then it seems there is no bound: A very thin annulus needs an aribitrarily large number of segments to connect diametrically opposed points.

annulus http://cs.smith.edu/%7Eorourke/MathOverflow/Annulus.jpgannulus

Perhaps I am misinterpreting the question, but if you mean: What is the maximum, over all $z_1$ and $z_2$, of the minimum number of segments in a polygonal line connecting $z_1$ to $z_2$, then it seems there is no bound: A very thin annulus needs an aribitrarily large number of segments to connect diametrically opposed points.

annulus http://cs.smith.edu/%7Eorourke/MathOverflow/Annulus.jpg

Perhaps I am misinterpreting the question, but if you mean: What is the maximum, over all $z_1$ and $z_2$, of the minimum number of segments in a polygonal line connecting $z_1$ to $z_2$, then it seems there is no bound: A very thin annulus needs an aribitrarily large number of segments to connect diametrically opposed points.

annulus

Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 150.9k
  • 36
  • 358
  • 958

Perhaps I am misinterpreting the question, but if you mean: What is the maximum, over all $z_1$ and $z_2$, of the minimum number of segments in a polygonal line connecting $z_1$ to $z_2$, then it seems there is no bound: A very thin annulus needs an aribitrarily large number of segments to connect diametrically opposed points.

annulus http://cs.smith.edu/%7Eorourke/MathOverflow/Annulus.jpg