Timeline for What elementary problems can you solve with schemes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
25 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 6, 2018 at 4:00 | answer | added | Will Chen | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 30, 2017 at 0:25 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 29, 2017 at 23:11 | answer | added | Saal Hardali | timeline score: 0 | |
Jul 16, 2013 at 0:05 | answer | added | Charles Staats | timeline score: 20 | |
Apr 4, 2013 at 0:20 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Possibly related: mathoverflow.net/questions/76942/… | |
May 4, 2011 at 4:43 | answer | added | Yuhao Huang | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 24, 2011 at 3:22 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Kim Morrison | ||
Mar 23, 2011 at 16:39 | comment | added | David Zureick-Brown | I'm not sure how many of these actually need schemes, but you might like this: math.stanford.edu/~vakil/725/funprobs.pdf | |
Mar 22, 2011 at 11:33 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 29 | |
Mar 22, 2011 at 8:57 | answer | added | Charles Matthews | timeline score: 24 | |
Mar 22, 2011 at 8:36 | answer | added | Guillermo Mantilla | timeline score: 8 | |
Mar 22, 2011 at 4:48 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 79 | |
Mar 22, 2011 at 4:43 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 71 | |
Mar 22, 2011 at 3:18 | answer | added | Felipe Voloch | timeline score: 116 | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 23:37 | answer | added | ACL | timeline score: 27 | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 20:59 | answer | added | Daniel Litt | timeline score: 22 | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 20:35 | comment | added | Niels | see also the following challenge (not elementary though) math.columbia.edu/~dejong/wordpress/?s=challenge | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 20:18 | answer | added | Dustin Clausen | timeline score: 48 | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 19:09 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Fermat's Last Theorem is a completely elementary problem, whose very nice proof uses schemes in an essential way... | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 18:44 | answer | added | Mike Skirvin | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 18:18 | comment | added | Charles Staats | Once you have enough scheme-theoretic machinery, there's an almost trivial proof that the nonsingular points of a variety form a dense open subset; see III.4 Prop. 3 of Mumford's Red Book, or Hartshorne Corollary II.8.16. The basic idea is to show that, in an appropriate sense, the variety is nonsingular at its generic point. | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 18:07 | answer | added | Charles Staats | timeline score: 12 | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 17:33 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 70 | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 16:32 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | My gut feeling is that this question has appeared on MO at least two times. But anyway, 1+, since I also wonder if there are elementary problems. | |
Mar 21, 2011 at 15:48 | history | asked | emperordali | CC BY-SA 2.5 |