Timeline for Torsion in tensor products over noncommutative rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2011 at 15:42 | vote | accept | TonyS | ||
Mar 20, 2011 at 15:41 | comment | added | TonyS | Ahh, very good. Thanks for your help. This are two conditions for $\omega_R$ i can work with. | |
Mar 20, 2011 at 15:20 | comment | added | user91132 | Yes. If $\omega_R$ is free as a right $R$-module, then it's flat as such. Now $M$ is torsion-free so $M \hookrightarrow R^k$ as a left $R$-module for some integer $k$. Therefore by flatness, $\omega_R \otimes_R M \hookrightarrow \omega_R \otimes_R R^k \cong \omega_R^k$ as a left $R$-module. So if you also know that the left $R$-module $\omega_R$ is torsion-free, then so is $\omega_R \otimes_R M$. For this argument to work it is necessary and sufficient for $\omega_R$ to be projective as a right $R$-module and torsion-free as a left $R$-module. | |
Mar 20, 2011 at 15:09 | comment | added | TonyS | Thanks! If $dim(A)=1$ and $rk(R)=4$, one can even compute $\omega_R$: $\omega_R=p^{-1}R$, where $p$ generates the radical ideal, i.e. $rad(R)=pR$. I also found the notion of Gorenstein orders, see for example arxiv.org/abs/math/0401425, these are orders such that $\omega_R$ and $R$ are isomorphic as left and right $R$-modules, but not necessarily as $R$-bimodules. But would this be enough for $\omega_R\otimes_R M$ to be torsion free over $A$, if we consider $\omega_R$ just as a left $R$-module, i.e. forget the left module structure? | |
Mar 20, 2011 at 13:14 | history | answered | user91132 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |