Timeline for Algebraically Closed subsets and strong amalgamation
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2011 at 20:14 | answer | added | Ioannis Souldatos | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 16, 2011 at 19:45 | answer | added | Jizhan Hong | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 16, 2011 at 18:57 | comment | added | Ioannis Souldatos | No, I am pretty sure the theorems are about algebraically closed substructures that are finite. I will look the references and post a more detailed comment. | |
| May 15, 2011 at 15:35 | comment | added | Jizhan Hong | The substructures in the theorem could be infinite? If so, could you please let me know where you came across it? | |
| May 1, 2011 at 0:10 | answer | added | Dima Sustretov | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 31, 2011 at 20:14 | comment | added | Ioannis Souldatos | No. The Joint Embedding Property (JEP) is different than Amalgamation. Consulting with professor Baldwin (from UIC) and looking around a few papers, I came to the conclusion that disjoint Amalgamation and strong Amalgamation (as defined here at least) refer to the same thing. Some other authors may define strong amalgamation differently. However, disjoint amalgamation seems to be standard terminology these days. | |
| Mar 16, 2011 at 18:51 | comment | added | Tom De Medts | In your question (2), do you mean the "joint embedding property" instead of "disjoint"? | |
| Mar 16, 2011 at 15:37 | history | asked | Ioannis Souldatos | CC BY-SA 2.5 |