Timeline for Is there a high-concept explanation for why "simplicial" leads to "homotopy-theoretic"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 21, 2016 at 23:51 | comment | added | Eric Auld | Anyone know of an English language version of this intro? | |
Mar 20, 2011 at 18:37 | comment | added | Jonathan Chiche | You are welcome. I just added some details, I hope this clarifies some points. | |
Mar 20, 2011 at 18:35 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Trying to fix the LaTeX mistakes once again…
|
Mar 20, 2011 at 16:24 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added a few details elaborating on Jacob Lurie's answer, corrected a few typos.; added 2 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
|
Mar 16, 2011 at 8:42 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
Mar 16, 2011 at 8:35 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 435 characters in body; added 101 characters in body
|
Mar 15, 2011 at 15:48 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 40 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body
|
Mar 15, 2011 at 15:38 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | It's also worth noting that $\Delta$ is "skelletique" in the sense of the appendix to Cisinski's book, which gives us even more nice combinatorial properties (although one might argue that this is circular, since the definition of a "skelletique" category is based on the definition of the simplex category). | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 15:25 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 442 characters in body
|
Mar 15, 2011 at 15:17 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4626 characters in body
|
Mar 15, 2011 at 8:52 | history | edited | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Adding a sentence; added 2 characters in body
|
Mar 15, 2011 at 8:47 | history | answered | Jonathan Chiche | CC BY-SA 2.5 |