Timeline for Hilbert, the nullstellensatz, and algebraic number theory [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2011 at 20:07 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | @Lucky Trent, please contact the moderators via email, at [email protected]. There is no contact information on your account, so I'm resorting to leaving a request here. | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 10:09 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | BTW: I really believe that you might not get so many questions closed, or at least get constructive comments, if you eschewed messing around with different monikers and were honest and open about your own mathematical background (cf. your answer/comment here: mathoverflow.net/questions/20386/mathematics-as-a-hobby/… ) If you ask questions about reasonably technical things, people are going to assume you have the relevant technical background and pitch their answers accordingly. | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 9:53 | comment | added | darij grinberg | "What did he use it for?" He did it for the lulz. | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 9:50 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | More to the point: what do you think "algebraic number theory" is, and why do you think it is distinct from "algebraic geometry"? And if you want to know what Hilbert used the Nulstellensatz for, what kind of answer are you hoping for? What level of technicality would be more useful or less useful to you, O Creature of Inconstant Name? | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 9:46 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Isn't this a false dichotomy? | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 9:40 | history | closed |
Andrés E. Caicedo Andy Putman Martin Brandenburg Pete L. Clark J.C. Ottem |
not a real question | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 9:40 | answer | added | user9072 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 5:47 | comment | added | KConrad | Why not tell us where you read that, for some more context? | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 4:15 | history | asked | teil | CC BY-SA 2.5 |