Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 22, 2011 at 3:02 comment added macbeth @Michael Beeson: Since $W$ and $V$ are two different parametrizations of $X$, we can write $V=W\circ\varphi$, for some self-diffeomorphism $\varphi$ of the disc. Since $W$ and $V$ are both conformal, we know that $\varphi$ must be locally conformal, hence conformal.
Mar 21, 2011 at 23:38 comment added Michael Beeson Now I have another difficulty with your answer. Let's check the uniqueness. Suppose $W$ and $V$ are two different isothermal parametrizations of $X$ (taking 0 to the same point and having the same x-derivative at 0). Then if I understand you, you want to define $\varphi:= W^{-1} V$ and say that $\varphi$ is a conformal mapping of the disk, fixing 0 and with $\varphi_x(0) = 1$, and therefore $\varphi$ is the identity. Nice, but, the domain of $W^{-1}$ is a geometric surface, so how do I define it if $W$ is not one-one? It seems this will only work to get LOCAL isothermal coordinates.
Mar 17, 2011 at 16:36 comment added Anton Petrunin The isothermal coordinate is a solution of some elliptic PDE with coefficients taken from the first fundamental form. Such solutions are known to be uniformly smooth in a compact subdomain. From this you should get $C^\infty$ case. For $C^n$ you have to be more careful, the first fundamental form is in class $C^{n-1}$, but if I remember right solution of elliptic equation with such coefficient should be $C^n$... (It was a while since I study this stuff.)
Mar 16, 2011 at 20:26 comment added Michael Beeson I tried to work out the details. There is a gap, though. Suppose we have a sequence of isothermal parametrizations $Y^{t_n}$ that are bounded in $C^n$ norm away from $X^0$. Now we need to argue by compactness that some subsequence converges. For that we need a uniform bound on the isothermal parametrizations $Y^t$. Where will we get a bound on the $C^n$ norms of the $Y^t$?
Mar 15, 2011 at 19:57 comment added Michael Beeson This seems like an excellent idea, and a big improvement over trying to check the detailed proofs. As soon as I can work out the details I will accept your answer.
Mar 15, 2011 at 17:42 history edited Anton Petrunin CC BY-SA 2.5
added 69 characters in body
Mar 15, 2011 at 4:02 history edited Anton Petrunin CC BY-SA 2.5
added 130 characters in body
Mar 15, 2011 at 2:37 history answered Anton Petrunin CC BY-SA 2.5