Timeline for Parts of Set Theory immune to independence
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2011 at 16:09 | history | edited | gowers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling of "principal"
|
| May 25, 2011 at 12:09 | comment | added | Justin Moore | @Tanmay: Sorry for the long delay -- I only now read your comment. This applied to all set forcings (asking this for class forcing is not reasonable). I'm not sure I understand the latter part of your comment. | |
| May 25, 2011 at 12:05 | history | edited | Justin Moore | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
\Rbb -> \mathbb{R}
|
| Mar 15, 2011 at 16:19 | comment | added | user3462 | Justin, thanks for the answer. I didn't know that something of the sort had actually been proved! Does this work for all sorts of forcings? How exactly is 'forcing' characterised here? Also, are you aware of any other places where something like this is there (even if there isn't explicitly a theorem which settles it like this)? P.s. Sorry for the late reply, I was hoping for a few more answers. | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 16:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 12, 2011 at 21:24 | history | edited | Justin Moore | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
fixed grammar in second paragraph
|
| Mar 12, 2011 at 20:48 | history | answered | Justin Moore | CC BY-SA 2.5 |