Timeline for Generalize Pearson
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2011 at 20:28 | vote | accept | Andrei | ||
| Mar 12, 2011 at 21:30 | answer | added | Michael Hardy | timeline score: -1 | |
| Mar 11, 2011 at 19:18 | answer | added | Or Zuk | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 11, 2011 at 19:05 | history | edited | Andrei | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 2 characters in body; added 139 characters in body
|
| Mar 11, 2011 at 18:57 | comment | added | Andrei | I need it to bevhave just like Person. Except that "older" values affect r less than newer values. I give older values smaller weight = smaller "importance". Does it make sense. For example if all $w_i$ are equal then it would become regular Pearson. | |
| Mar 11, 2011 at 18:14 | comment | added | Piotr Migdal | First of all - what do you need the generalization for? What kind of quantity you would like to measure, what properties you would like to have, etc... | |
| Mar 11, 2011 at 16:47 | history | asked | Andrei | CC BY-SA 2.5 |