Timeline for Simple adjective for "of the size of a proper class"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2011 at 8:46 | vote | accept | Hans-Peter Stricker | ||
| Mar 9, 2011 at 7:03 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Of the answers given so far, "proper-class-many" wins for being completely unambiguous, although it's not as simple as some of the others. But what I fail to see now is why any of this is an issue. Just say something at the outset of the paper or talk, as in my edited answer. | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 4:23 | answer | added | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | timeline score: 12 | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 4:22 | answer | added | Gerhard Paseman | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 1:31 | comment | added | Hans-Peter Stricker | To be honest: I cannot see why this question should be closed. Is it trivial, "not a real question", subjective,... whatever? I, personally, see it as a problem that one cannot talk of collections being "of the size of a proper class" by a single, simple adjective - may it be composed like "weakly/strongly inaccessible" or not. | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 1:11 | history | edited | Hans-Peter Stricker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2011 at 1:00 | answer | added | Todd Trimble | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 0:43 | history | edited | Hans-Peter Stricker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2011 at 0:40 | comment | added | Hans-Peter Stricker | @Harry: Thanks for renaming the tag. I'll keep that in mind. | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 0:37 | history | edited | Harry Gindi |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 9, 2011 at 0:35 | answer | added | Harry Gindi | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 0:32 | history | asked | Hans-Peter Stricker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |