Timeline for Canonical Time Evolution for Type $II_{1}$-Factors?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 10, 2013 at 0:01 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | @Jiang: The best known results in this direction follow the line of investigation started in Ioana, Peterson and Popa, which contains the first explicit computation of outer automorphism groups of factors. This work involves free products, but one cannot access free groups directly with these techniques. | |
| May 1, 2011 at 12:31 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | Right. I think care must be taken to restrict to those groups for which this is a cnd function. (This kind of indicates what I've suggested may not be canonical...) | |
| May 1, 2011 at 9:25 | comment | added | Alain Valette | If the length function is not conditionally negative definite, why should this semigroup be c.p.? | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 17:15 | history | edited | Jon Bannon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 246 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2011 at 17:39 | history | edited | Jon Bannon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 88 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2011 at 17:32 | history | edited | Jon Bannon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 374 characters in body; added 58 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2011 at 17:09 | history | edited | Jon Bannon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 13 characters in body; added 8 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2011 at 17:03 | history | edited | Jon Bannon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2011 at 16:52 | history | asked | Jon Bannon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |