Skip to main content
add reference on geography
Source Link
Jon Awbrey
  • 403
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack.

Addenda

For an introduction to asymptotic enumeration and random graphs (mentioned several times below), see:

For one of the inaugural applications of graph theory to social networks, see:

For applications to geography, there's this eBook:

For recursive and self-similar graphs in knot theory, an ever-good springboard is:

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack.

Addenda

For an introduction to asymptotic enumeration and random graphs (mentioned several times below), see:

For one of the inaugural applications of graph theory to social networks, see:

For recursive and self-similar graphs in knot theory, an ever-good springboard is:

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack.

Addenda

For an introduction to asymptotic enumeration and random graphs (mentioned several times below), see:

For one of the inaugural applications of graph theory to social networks, see:

For applications to geography, there's this eBook:

For recursive and self-similar graphs in knot theory, an ever-good springboard is:

addenda
Source Link
Jon Awbrey
  • 403
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack.

Addenda

For an introduction to asymptotic enumeration and random graphs (mentioned several times below), see:

For one of the inaugural applications of graph theory to social networks, see:

For recursive and self-similar graphs in knot theory, an ever-good springboard is:

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack.

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack.

Addenda

For an introduction to asymptotic enumeration and random graphs (mentioned several times below), see:

For one of the inaugural applications of graph theory to social networks, see:

For recursive and self-similar graphs in knot theory, an ever-good springboard is:

trim chatter
Source Link
Jon Awbrey
  • 403
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14

Gosh, where to begin?

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack. The literature went legion long ago.

Gosh, where to begin?

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack. The literature went legion long ago.

In computer science, one way of providing a semantics for programs is by using infinite trees to model do-loops in finite flow-graphs. Dana Scott and Marshall Hall are the earliest I recall. Arbib and Manes later on.

A lot of knot theory can be tackled by a similar tack.

+ ref
Source Link
Jon Awbrey
  • 403
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
Jon Awbrey
  • 403
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14
Loading