Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 3, 2013 at 2:34 answer added user21574 timeline score: 3
Jun 15, 2011 at 5:01 answer added S. Carnahan timeline score: 3
Jun 15, 2011 at 1:53 answer added Jeremy Teitelbaum timeline score: 6
Mar 9, 2011 at 8:01 vote accept wood
Mar 8, 2011 at 6:49 answer added monodromy timeline score: 11
Mar 8, 2011 at 6:09 answer added Minhyong Kim timeline score: 41
Mar 7, 2011 at 14:40 answer added Chandan Singh Dalawat timeline score: 10
Mar 7, 2011 at 14:36 answer added Anatoly Kochubei timeline score: 11
Mar 7, 2011 at 14:03 comment added wood Using the Haar measure we can do integration on p adic numbers. But only of complex or real valued functions and not functions which attain p-adic values itself. Right? But this I explicitly excluded.
Mar 7, 2011 at 13:55 comment added Kevin Buzzard There are several ways to interpret this question; perhaps the questioner doesn't want to make the question more precise though, because leaving it vague may maximise the amount of answers he/she will get! There is a perfectly good Haar measure on $\mathbf{Q}_p$, and so one can do classical integration on this, and integrate $L^2$ functions and so on. But $\mathbf{C}_p$ is not locally compact so there is trouble doing that. There is also Coleman integration, which is much more technical and relies on "Frobenius lifting"---see a paper of Colemanfromthe80s called sthg like "p-adic integration".
Mar 7, 2011 at 13:24 comment added Niyazi wood, last semester I gave a talk on similar things. I started with Silverman's excellent book "Arithmetic of dynamical systems" and then I jump to Baker's Potential Theory on Berkovich spaces to show the existence of some kind of Lyubich measure. There are also many papers about p-adic functional analysis and they should use measure theory.
Mar 7, 2011 at 13:24 answer added Franz Lemmermeyer timeline score: 5
Mar 7, 2011 at 12:54 history asked wood CC BY-SA 2.5