Timeline for Order of $\zeta(1+it)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 at 18:08 | answer | added | Micah Milinovich | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 7:03 | history | edited | Brad Rodgers | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 77 characters in body
|
| Mar 7, 2011 at 6:57 | vote | accept | Brad Rodgers | ||
| Mar 7, 2011 at 6:20 | answer | added | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 5:55 | history | edited | Brad Rodgers | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 122 characters in body
|
| Mar 7, 2011 at 5:52 | comment | added | Brad Rodgers | Ah, I see now from chapter 14 of Titchmarsh's book (which to be fair I ought to have consulted) the result David mentions. @Frank, it's at the end of chapter 8. So, that morally answers my question at least; I'm going to edit it above to see if anyone happens to know an unconditional result, but thanks! | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 5:20 | comment | added | Daniel Parry | I could refer you to Apostle's analytic number theory book chapter 13 which has a set of inequalities for zeta. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 5:20 | comment | added | David Hansen | RH implies the optimality of Titchmarsh's result. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 5:12 | comment | added | Frank Thorne | +1, this is cool. What chapter of Iwaniec-Kowalski? | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 3:29 | history | asked | Brad Rodgers | CC BY-SA 2.5 |