Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 21 at 2:37 comment added Ryan Budney @PaulMeier: I was talking about the 3-dimensional case, at that point.
Mar 18, 2015 at 16:19 comment added Andreas Thom @PaulMeier: It is not true that $\pi_2$ is always finitely generated, see A. Dimca, S. Papadima, A. Suciu, Non-finiteness properties of fundamental groups of smooth projective varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 629 (2009), 89–105.
Oct 12, 2012 at 13:45 comment added Paul Meier A bit offtopic, but I would like to know why pi_2 of a compact manifold is always finitely generated as module over pi_1? (One knows that this is not true for an arbitrary finite CW-complex.)
Jan 10, 2010 at 0:02 vote accept Ilya Nikokoshev
Jan 9, 2010 at 21:43 history edited Ryan Budney CC BY-SA 2.5
adapt to new statement of the question
Jan 9, 2010 at 21:14 history edited Ryan Budney CC BY-SA 2.5
moved my comment into response, to TeX it up
Jan 9, 2010 at 21:02 history edited Ryan Budney CC BY-SA 2.5
TeX it up
Nov 17, 2009 at 0:40 comment added Ryan Budney There are some natural K(pi,1) manifolds, but they seem to be a very sparse family among manifolds. Once you get beyond dimension 3 I'd suspect non-positively curved manifolds are extremely rare. For example, take a connect sum of n copies of CP^2. Those never have NPC metrics, and yet they represent oriented 4-manifolds up to cobordism. Are there any good theorems about how NPC metrics relate to cobordism, Stiefel-Whitney and Pontriagin numbers? I would guess NPC manifolds represent a very sparse sub-ring of the oriented cobordism ring.
Nov 17, 2009 at 0:19 comment added Tom Church But compact boundaryless manifolds are quite often Eilenberg-Maclane spaces, for example any manifold with a non-positively curved Riemannian metric.
Nov 16, 2009 at 23:23 history edited Ryan Budney CC BY-SA 2.5
tweak
Nov 16, 2009 at 23:13 history edited Ryan Budney CC BY-SA 2.5
small tweak
Nov 16, 2009 at 23:07 history answered Ryan Budney CC BY-SA 2.5