Timeline for Tensor product of rings of Witt vectors
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 10, 2022 at 12:13 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated the link, the previous one went to a 404 error page
|
| May 10, 2022 at 9:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 10, 2022 at 12:13 | |||||
| S Jan 5, 2016 at 3:57 | history | suggested | LSpice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed link
|
| Jan 5, 2016 at 2:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 5, 2016 at 3:57 | |||||
| Mar 5, 2011 at 6:15 | vote | accept | AJ Stewart | ||
| Mar 4, 2011 at 17:01 | history | edited | Wilberd van der Kallen | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body; edited body
|
| Mar 4, 2011 at 12:41 | comment | added | JBorger | Maybe it's also worth pointing out that without the etaleness assumption, it's usually false (but not always). For example, it's false for $C=\mathbf{F}_p$, $A=B=C[x]$, $n=2$. Also, in the case where $C$ is an $\mathbf{F}_p$-algebra, the result is due to Illusie, in his ENS paper on the de Rham-Witt complex. | |
| Mar 4, 2011 at 12:36 | history | answered | Wilberd van der Kallen | CC BY-SA 2.5 |