Timeline for Is the Fell-Doran problem trivial in a topological setting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2009 at 10:20 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | (Yes, Enflo. Was half-asleep at the time. Thanks.) Surely the people who've thought about Fell-Doran know about the approximation problem, so there must be something extremely non-trivial in the technicalities. | |
| Nov 17, 2009 at 9:25 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | You mean Enflo ;-> But that's a great idea! Yes, if $X$ fails to have the approximation property, then "morally" (this area is full of technicalities) your algebra $A$ (being the finite ranks with unity) cannot be strongly dense, but it does have the other properties... The problem is that "morally" does not equal "proof". | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 20:05 | history | edited | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 617 characters in body
|
| Nov 16, 2009 at 19:07 | history | answered | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 2.5 |