Timeline for Riemannian manifold of bounded geometry has a normal bundle of bounded geometry
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 3, 2011 at 4:38 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 783 characters in body
|
Mar 2, 2011 at 20:41 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Alex, that appears to be exactly the Riemannian metric on the normal bundle that I used. In other words, there is a natural immersion of the normal bundle into $R^N$, and the metric on the normal bundle is just restriction of the metric on $R^N$ to $T_*N_*M$. | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 19:12 | comment | added | AlexE | @Deane Yang: The normal bundle $NM \subset TR^N$ is the orthogonal complement of $TM$ w.r.t. the standard Euclidean metric on R^N. Here the embedding $TM \subset TR^N$ comes from the isometric embedding $M \to R^N$. Now we use on $NM \subset TR^N$ the induced metric and the induced connection (which is given by the standard Euclidean connection on R^N composed with the orthogonal projection onto NM). Perhaps my words "pull-back metric/connection" were not well chosen - "induced" is better. | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 18:52 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Anton, if the Riemannian metric is the one induced by the embedding of, say, a small tubular neighborhood of the zero section in Euclidean space, then it is almost tautological to say that the metric is flat. But maybe I'm using the wrong metric on the normal bundle? | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 17:31 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | Do you want to say that normal bundle has zero curvature? (I do not think so --- say normal bundle of $\mathbb C\mathrm P^2$...) | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 15:25 | history | answered | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |