Timeline for What about stacks of categories in algebraic geometry?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 25 at 15:29 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
a minor typo
|
Jul 13, 2021 at 1:37 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @CharlesRezk as it turns out, Drinfeld has a recent paper talking about "algebraic c-stacks", which is basically the same thing I was thinking of in this and subsequent questions. | |
May 12, 2014 at 10:42 | vote | accept | David Roberts♦ | ||
Jun 13 at 1:39 | |||||
Mar 1, 2011 at 18:32 | history | edited | Torsten Ekedahl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Commentary on algebraic stacks from categories.
|
Mar 1, 2011 at 16:24 | comment | added | Charles Rezk | This leaves the question: is there a place for a theory of "category valued algebraic stacks"? | |
Mar 1, 2011 at 14:18 | history | edited | Torsten Ekedahl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added clarification on non-invertible morphisms
|
Mar 1, 2011 at 14:10 | comment | added | shenghao | Dear Torsten: Could you explain a little more about the last paragraph? I thought when doing descent, one still needs "transition isomorphisms" rather than non-isomorphisms, so I got confused by what you mean. Thanks! | |
Mar 1, 2011 at 6:33 | history | answered | Torsten Ekedahl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |