Timeline for smoothness of solution for second order elliptic problem
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 4, 2013 at 0:30 | comment | added | timur | A necessary condition is convexity of the domain. | |
Mar 20, 2011 at 21:58 | vote | accept | Mihai | ||
Mar 2, 2011 at 17:33 | comment | added | Mihai | Gilbarg and Trudinger assume smooth boundaries as far as I see. I am going through Grisvard right now to see what I can figure out from there. | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 3:23 | answer | added | Michael Renardy | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 2:02 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 0:30 | comment | added | Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman | For an example of things that can go wrong since $\Gamma$ is not smooth, see mathoverflow.net/questions/38054/… | |
Mar 1, 2011 at 20:49 | history | edited | Mihai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 109 characters in body
|
Mar 1, 2011 at 17:26 | comment | added | Mihai | @Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman: I updated the problem definition. @Willie Wong: thanks for the pointer, I will check it out today. | |
Mar 1, 2011 at 17:25 | history | edited | Mihai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 196 characters in body
|
Mar 1, 2011 at 0:11 | comment | added | Willie Wong | have you looked at Gilbarg and Trudinger? | |
Mar 1, 2011 at 0:06 | comment | added | Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman | Is $\Gamma$ the boundary of $\Omega$? If so, what kind of regularity are you assuming for $\Gamma$? | |
Feb 28, 2011 at 23:19 | history | asked | Mihai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |