Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 3, 2019 at 20:17 history edited Qfwfq CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 8 characters in body; edited title
Aug 3, 2019 at 19:18 comment added Mishkaat From scheme theoretic perspective, how do wish to 'deal' with additional structures like metrics, symplectic forms, hermitian or kahler structures?
Nov 11, 2011 at 1:17 comment added David Carchedi I'm quite interested in this question. Made any progress since Feb?
Feb 27, 2011 at 18:29 comment added Qfwfq @JohanesEbert: recovering $g$ up to conformal equivalence would already be nice. And what about LRS morphisms: would they correspond to conformal mappings?
Feb 27, 2011 at 18:26 comment added Qfwfq @Zack: ya.. it looks like so. Perhaps my definition is just useless. But I don't know how morphisms of symplectic/Riemannian manifolds induce homomorphisms on that sheaves.
Feb 27, 2011 at 18:18 comment added Zack Isn't $\mathcal{O}[\omega]$ just $\mathcal{O}[x]/x^{n+1}$?
Feb 27, 2011 at 17:40 comment added Johannes Ebert You cannot recover $g$ from $\mathcal{O}[g]$, only up to conformal equivalence.
Feb 27, 2011 at 16:31 comment added Qfwfq @André: In the theory of "supermanifolds" people already use sheaves of $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$-graded rings. And there are some recent theories of "derived manifolds" (of which I don't know anything). But my question was perhaps more down to earth. Anyway, why do you suggets using differential graded rings? Is it to keep track that the "generator" $g$ in $\mathcal{O}_X[g]$ is placed in (tensor) degree 2?
Feb 27, 2011 at 16:24 comment added André Henriques Maybe it could be useful to generalize the notion of locally ringed space, and allow "structure sheaves" with values in categories other than rings (e.g. differential graded rings).
Feb 27, 2011 at 16:08 history asked Qfwfq CC BY-SA 2.5