Timeline for An application of the Künneth formula in the proof of the theorem of the cube
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2022 at 9:55 | comment | added | The Amplitwist |
The link to eom.springer.de is broken. The article can now be found here: Künneth formula - Encyclopedia of Mathematics.
|
|
| Nov 16, 2009 at 16:18 | comment | added | Wayne | Thank you for pointing out the key point - it definitely helped me. Yes for the theorem of the cube I only need an abstract isomorphism to reduce the argument. | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 16:11 | vote | accept | Wayne | ||
| Nov 16, 2009 at 5:34 | comment | added | Greg Stevenson | No worries at all about the fussiness! I edited to try and answer your question in the comment. I hope this helps (in the proof I know nothing is asserted about what the isomorphisms actually are). | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 5:28 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
addressed comment
|
| Nov 16, 2009 at 5:03 | comment | added | Wayne | Awesome, thank you! I think to make the question more precise, I should add "and $M_1$ is a line bundle on $Y_1$" (please look at line 6-7 in the question.) I do have a small question (and please forgive my fussiness): so we know $M_1^{-1}$ and $p_2{_*}(L_1)$ are isomorphic line bundles, but how do we know that the explicit morphism given in the question is an isomorphism? | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 4:33 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Nov 16, 2009 at 4:25 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added ref for Kunneth
|
| Nov 16, 2009 at 3:58 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Nov 16, 2009 at 3:52 | history | answered | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |