Timeline for Local complementation group of simple graphs
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2011 at 17:34 | history | edited | P.H. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2011 at 7:17 | history | edited | P.H. |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 27, 2011 at 3:56 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 26, 2011 at 21:11 | comment | added | P.H. | Stated in this context, if I'm not mistaken, the question becomes: (if true!)Why is the local complementation group on k graphs (in an lc-orbit), either k-transitive or (k-2)-transitive? | |
| Feb 26, 2011 at 19:31 | comment | added | aaron | Okay, thanks. This is an interesting question. | |
| Feb 26, 2011 at 12:41 | comment | added | Tom De Medts | The local complementation w.r.t. a given vertex v is the operation that changes the subgraph induced on the neighbors of v (not including v) into its complement. In particular, it is an involution, so the "local complementation group" is a transitive group generated by involutions. | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 20:12 | comment | added | aaron | What is a local complementation operation? | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 19:53 | history | asked | P.H. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |