Timeline for Abstract nonsense versions of "combinatorial" group theory questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2010 at 4:15 | answer | added | Jack Schmidt | timeline score: 11 | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 2:45 | answer | added | Pavel Etingof | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 19:31 | answer | added | David Jordan | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 16:30 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 5:08 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 3:15 | comment | added | Harrison Brown | Although in my case it's not prelims so much as undergraduate-level abstract algebra test, so I'm probably overthinking it. Still curious about the question on its own merits, though. | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 3:06 | comment | added | Harrison Brown | alexzander, that's my justification too. I never did like abstract algebra 'til I learned to start thinking of it in categorical terms. | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 0:49 | comment | added | alekzander | I was wondering this just last week. I have prelims to start worrying about, and categorical statements always stick best. | |
| Nov 16, 2009 at 0:41 | history | asked | Harrison Brown | CC BY-SA 2.5 |