Timeline for Fast turn-around times
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2018 at 1:35 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | The AMS used to publish this information, but as far as I know they had to stop, because some countries (in Europe, I think) considered this to be advertising (because AMS journals had good turnaround times) and comparisons like this were not permitted in advertising (in those countries). | |
| Nov 25, 2017 at 15:19 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 25, 2017 at 21:23 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2017 at 3:11 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 13, 2017 at 5:47 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 26, 2016 at 19:42 | answer | added | BigM | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 6:41 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | That is a good point. But I would hope that careful consideration of the appropriateness of the journal, its editors and target audience would outweigh the rush by people to see their articles appear quicker. There are constraints at least for Australian mathematicians as to the rankings of journals as seen by our main funding agency which are a huge factor in deciding where to publish. | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 6:20 | comment | added | Hailong Dao | I am a little worried that the journals which appear as answers to this question would become slower... | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 3:58 | answer | added | Karl Schwede | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 3:16 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 309 characters in body; added 7 characters in body
|
| Feb 21, 2011 at 3:14 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @Ben - In the book 'A primer of mathematical writing' (page 82/83 on google books). See the link in the answer by Jason Rute below. | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 2:09 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | Where did you read that this is information is published in the Notices of the AMS? I don't remember every hearing about anything like that. | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 1:55 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | I am a bit short on the evidence that you're after, but thought I'd remark that some of the quickest response times I've had has been followed by what, to me at least, seemed quite shoddy post-acceptance-processing. This is to do with the publisher's apparent workflow rather than the journal, of course. | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 1:07 | answer | added | known google | timeline score: 15 | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 1:06 | answer | added | Jason Rute | timeline score: 12 | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 0:25 | history | asked | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |