Timeline for Are quotients of polynomial rings almost UFDs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 17, 2020 at 22:17 | history | suggested | user26857 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improving format
|
| Sep 17, 2020 at 21:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 17, 2020 at 22:17 | |||||
| Sep 3, 2017 at 7:24 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear @Fred, Bourbaki considers a field to be a PID : cf. definition on first page of Algebra, Chapter VII). My (not very clear) parenthetical remark alludes to my belief that fields are generally not considred PID's, But maybe that belief is mistaken? | |
| Sep 2, 2017 at 20:21 | comment | added | Fred Rohrer | Dear @Georges, I do not understand your final parenthetical remark. Do you mean that Bourbaki does not call a (commutative!) field principal? | |
| Nov 15, 2009 at 0:35 | history | answered | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |